Julien Salort:
>> Now I have a bunch of Octave-only code that I can't share with
>> anyone. If I had chosen Matlab in the first place, I would be able to
>> publish the code without restriction. This is very paradoxical and I had
>> not anticipated this problem.

Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso:
>The problem isn't Octave. It's the license of the non-free libraries
>it's linking to. Matlab's license is even more restrictive and I
>imagine they would also consider you linking to both libraries to be
>worse. The GPL is far more permissive than Matlab's license, so I
>imagine Matlab's EULA would also pose the same problem. 

I definitely think not.  I can't imagine the Matlab lawyers ask anyone
to unpublish code that allows Matlab to link with instrumentation.  That
would be against their own interest.

This is a real problem for Octave.  If really it is not currently
possible to publish a wrapper that allows Octave to call an external
instrumentation routine, then adding an exception to the Octave licence
should be considered.

-- 
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore)        Voice:  +39.050.315.3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR          Mobile: +39.348.8283.107
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa         Skype:  wnlabisti
(entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71)     Web:    http://fly.isti.cnr.it


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to