On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 24, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Devin Han wrote: >>> >>>> 2011/8/24 Rob Weir <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> There is a question on the issue, do we want JIRA or Bugzilla? >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3877 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There are two articles compared JIRA and Bugzilla: >>>> http://kb.almworks.com/wiki/JIRA_vs._Bugzilla >>>> http://www.vietnamesetestingboard.org/zbxe/?document_srl=268301 >>>> It sounds like JIRA is better. >>> >>> I prefer JIRA. Any strong opinions? >>> >> >> If it can be done starting with our BZ dump file, then I'm fine with >> JIRA. Maybe even a mild preference for it. But I'd rather not >> introduce migration complexities that will take weeks to resolve. >> Any sense for what the migration of BZ to JIRA requires? Is this >> something that Infra can run with? > > Here are two comments from the issue: > > Mark Thomas added a comment - 24/Aug/11 15:08 >> The three options are: >> - new BZ instance >> - import into existing BZ instance >> - import into existing JIRA instance >> >> Importing into the existing BZ instance is likely to be a PITA and will also >> require all the issue IDs to change. > > Sebb added a comment - 24/Aug/11 15:41 >> In the case of JIRA import, can the original BZ ids be stored as attributes >> of the new issues? >> >> I think this was done for some ASF projects that moved from Bugzilla to JIRA. >
Great. +1 for JIRA from me. > > Regards, > Dave > >> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -Devin >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -Devin >>> >>> > >
