+0
2011/8/25 Rob Weir <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Aug 24, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Devin Han wrote: >>>> >>>>> 2011/8/24 Rob Weir <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> There is a question on the issue, do we want JIRA or Bugzilla? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3877 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> There are two articles compared JIRA and Bugzilla: >>>>> http://kb.almworks.com/wiki/JIRA_vs._Bugzilla >>>>> http://www.vietnamesetestingboard.org/zbxe/?document_srl=268301 >>>>> It sounds like JIRA is better. >>>> >>>> I prefer JIRA. Any strong opinions? >>>> >>> >>> If it can be done starting with our BZ dump file, then I'm fine with >>> JIRA. Maybe even a mild preference for it. But I'd rather not >>> introduce migration complexities that will take weeks to resolve. >>> Any sense for what the migration of BZ to JIRA requires? Is this >>> something that Infra can run with? >> >> Here are two comments from the issue: >> >> Mark Thomas added a comment - 24/Aug/11 15:08 >>> The three options are: >>> - new BZ instance >>> - import into existing BZ instance >>> - import into existing JIRA instance >>> >>> Importing into the existing BZ instance is likely to be a PITA and will >>> also require all the issue IDs to change. >> >> Sebb added a comment - 24/Aug/11 15:41 >>> In the case of JIRA import, can the original BZ ids be stored as attributes >>> of the new issues? >>> >>> I think this was done for some ASF projects that moved from Bugzilla to >>> JIRA. >> > > Great. +1 for JIRA from me. > >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andy >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -Devin >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -Devin >>>> >>>> >> >> >
