Am 21.09.2011 09:30, schrieb Devin Han: > Hi all, > > As you know, most of migration work has been completed except JIRA and IP > clearance. I think it's time to discuss the change set will be included in > the first release. > We have had a agreement that there would no new feature included in this > version. In my opinion, the content of the first release should contain: > 1. Rename package name from "org.odftoolkit" to "org.apache"; > 2. Simple API and ODFDOM merge; > 3. License update; > 4. Code refactor, it's an opportunity to remove the deprecated method, > change method name and clear the code. User has the biggest tolerance this > time. > > Any comment? I believe we all have agreed not to add new features to our first release. The general question is, shall we minimize our changes for the first release to get a release as soon as possible ready, which is basically identical to the last one in ODF TOOLKIT, only in a different location with our environment set-up and documented. Or shall we do required major code changes as well, so the user will have no larger problems after using that version.
I would vote for release often and early and do two releases before coming up with a feature release. First do a more-or-less identical release of former ODF Toolkit and second to the required changes. We might still want to adapt the license - to avoid any legal problems - and the package names - to make obvious where the code comes from -, as users might do package changes easily with a search & replace. But I have no strong feelings on that. Regards, Svante
