On 22.09.2011 20:57, Svante Schubert wrote: > Am 22.09.2011 19:17, schrieb Rob Weir: >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Svante Schubert >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 5) We need to agree on an initial version number for the release. >> Apache ODF Toolkit version X.X ? > Currently every module ODF Validator, ODFDOM and Simple API has its own > version number. (Michael Brauer - the former project owner - had not > given a version number to the validator, but I added one with the recent > update). the validator already has a version number, currently 1.1.4: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/odf/trunk/validator/src/main/java/org/odftoolkit/odfvalidator/Main.java?revision=1172466&view=markup#l41 > The versions are now: > 0.6.6. for Simple API > 0.8.7 for ODFDOM and the validator. so now the validator has two version numbers? > Does it makes sense to give each module its version number and a > different one for the overall umbrella deliverable? > I think this make sense as if there are new tools in the future, they > might start with their own numbering and if a module was not change its > version will not be updated, otherwise confusing the user. > > Therefore my suggestion is to keep the version numbers of all sub > projects and give the overall project the highest version number of all > for the start, 0.8.7. a good strategy in principle, but how do you prevent ambiguities when the validator again reaches higher version numbers in the 1.x range that were already used previously? > - Svante regards, michael
