OK, will update it in RC2. 2011/11/28 Rob Weir <[email protected]>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Devin Han <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I will terminate this discussion 24 hours later. Is there anything more > > feedback for RC1? > > > > I think I found another issue. Remember the discussion we had about > what went in NOTICE and what went in LICENSE file? I said LICENSE > should only contain the Apache license and everything else should go > in NOTICE. But I just read this JIRA issue from legal-discuss: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-62 > > I think I was wrong before. The full licenses for the code we ship > should go into LICENSE. So Apache as well as other licenses. > > NOTICE then has any "required third-party notices" and "copyright > notices moved from source files submitted to the ASF". > > The JIRA issue points to the Apache server as a good example: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE > > -Rob > > > > All of the reasonable suggestions will be included in RC2 and we will > start > > a formal vote for it in this week. > > > > 2011/11/25 Devin Han <[email protected]> > > > >> Thank you for point it out, will update in RC2. > >> > >> > >> 2011/11/23 Svante Schubert <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Hi Devin, > >>> > >>> the RC1 looks good to me. > >>> > >>> Two minor remarks: > >>> 1) if you use Maven 3, there is warning that in the pom.xml of the > >>> Simple API the maven-assemply-plugin in line 390 is duplicated. > >>> I removed the following > >>> > >>> <plugin> > >>> <artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</artifactId> > >>> <executions> > >>> <execution> > >>> <id>single</id> > >>> <phase>package</phase> > >>> <goals> > >>> <goal>single</goal> > >>> </goals> > >>> </execution> > >>> </executions> > >>> </plugin> > >>> > >>> and made a "mvn clean install" and the created artifacts are the same, > >>> but the warning was gone. > >>> > >>> 2) And minor typo result to a JavaDoc warning in > >>> trunk/generator/schema2template/src/main/javadoc/overview.html > >>> > >>> where the '@' of '@odf.attribute' have to be masked. > >>> Line 245 will be changed from > >>> * see {@odf.attribute ${attribute}} > >>> to > >>> * see {@odf.attribute ${attribute}} > >>> > >>> Looking forward to the RC1, > >>> Svante > >>> > >>> Am 22.11.2011 03:27, schrieb Devin Han: > >>> > Hi all, > >>> > > >>> > After learning Apache release policy[1], I prepared a candidate > release > >>> on > >>> > people.apache.org. > >>> > First time do this work, so maybe exist omission or misunderstand, > >>> please > >>> > examine it and give your comments. > >>> > If this candidate is passed, is the technical work for the first > release > >>> > ready? > >>> > > >>> > The candidate for the ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating-rc1 release is > >>> available > >>> > at: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > http://people.apache.org/~devinhan/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.5-incubating/rc1 > >>> > > >>> > SVN Tag: > >>> > > >>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc1/ > >>> > > >>> > Change Notes: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt > >>> > > >>> > --------------------------------- > >>> > [1]http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> -Devin > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -Devin > > > -- -Devin
