On 4/15/06, Holger Freyther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Pals, > > as Richard of o-hand.com will be too shy to mention it I'm hereby > claiming a cached run of BitBake only takes a couple of seconds while > still being able to reread changed BitBake files. This is an enormous > speed increase with almost no costs ATM. > > Also a couple of other bugs have been fixed which result in a more > stable BitBake trunk. Now to the costs of this enormous speed increase: > -Moving variables (e.g. TIME, SRCDATE) do not work with the Cache > for a couple of things (mainly dependencies). We plan to fix that but > it is not too easy to do. > -For a bug workaround we currently do a copy of a variable which > slightly reduces performance again. We will fix that as well. > > We would be glad if you could test this version of BitBake and report > failure or success to us. I would like to thank Richard for tackling > this task. And I hope we can release a faster and better tested > version of BitBake soon.
Wow, excellent! Matt _______________________________________________ Oe mailing list [email protected] https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
