On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 11:21 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > That is rather weird. What happens if you "bitbake -v glibc-2.4"?
At a guess, bitbake is rejecting the 2.4 version as unbuildable, perhaps as one of its dependencies isn't provided (or a dependency of a dependency). I think there is magic in the angstrom distro files that "fixes" this. Perhaps it was this: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libc-for-gcc = "glibc-intermediate" PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/arm-linux-libc-for-gcc = "glibc-intermediate" It would be nice if bitbake was a little more verbose about such things. Richard _______________________________________________ Oe mailing list [email protected] https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
