-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Richard Purdie schreef:
> On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 11:21 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> That is rather weird.  What happens if you "bitbake -v glibc-2.4"?
> 
> At a guess, bitbake is rejecting the 2.4 version as unbuildable, perhaps
> as one of its dependencies isn't provided (or a dependency of a
> dependency). I think there is magic in the angstrom distro files that
> "fixes" this. Perhaps it was this:
> 
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libc-for-gcc = 
> "glibc-intermediate"
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/arm-linux-libc-for-gcc = "glibc-intermediate"
> 
> It would be nice if bitbake was a little more verbose about such things.

you could try to do a 'bitbake -g' to get the dot graph file if you have
bitbake 1.5.x.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEmtIPMkyGM64RGpERAic+AKCLaQTbcV4RG00nj7eLoHaBAf9K4QCffQWn
CaDhXGb2wLjL9aLMM0x3ONs=
=QjG/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Oe mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe

Reply via email to