-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [I get the list via gmane, so remove me from the frigging reply-to]
Richard Purdie schreef: > As hinted, I take issue with this :). As we can now lock patches to a > given time period thanks to a neat idea/implementation by hrw, there is > no longer an issue of making a given SCM based .bb file build against a > variety of SRCDATES. The current use of min/maxdate just tags the patch as 'does not apply after <date>', but I haven't seen people adding a rediffed patch to address the problems the first patch was solving. We need to take great care with this, because right now we are loosing patches. > Why split them into several files which are all > effectively the same when a little thought can make it work in one file? > Having multiple files means fixes are less likely to propagate all > versions as well. That's why we have .inc files :) But agree on 'less is more' regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEshmtMkyGM64RGpERAn2cAJ9lMAF8OJfcJ2KtJvtPFEl6PkDxBgCgma5y ZFeVO57bZ5HMOsjS0khlQHU= =XZiR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Oe mailing list [email protected] https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
