David, Forget it, I was thinking that we may not use anymore the category description field, but I guess it's needed if we want to keep things fast.
So Si, it seems that if you want to remove the description field from demo ProductCategory data it's ok, isn'it ? Jacques > > Jacques, > > Sorry, you lost me. What is the "DB description" field, and what > refactoring and such would this imply? > > -David > > > On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > David, > > > > OK, and what about the DB description field always needed and some > > DB refactoring that this (and more eventually) may imply ? > > > > Jacques > > > > > > From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> For "demo" data, the performance doesn't matter as much. Better to > >> demonstrate and test, at least with one of the fields. > >> > >> -David > >> > >> > >> On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> > >>> I'm not sure because as David already explained there are 2 ways > >>> for this. > >>> Quick one : std description field > >>> Longuer one : std description field overidden by data source > >>> content (this implies a default locale that seems ok now) > >>> > >>> And IIRW David seemed to keep std description field because it's > >>> quicker. > >>> Actually, if we do according to your proposition is the DB > >>> description field always needed ? > >>> And if we go in this direction maybe some DB refactoring have to be > >>> thought about ? > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> From: "Si Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> So should we remove the description field from these > >>>> ProductCategory > >>>> in the demo data? I think so, or how would one be able to see the > >>>> alternate locale description?
