Yes, let's do that so the demo data would allow people to see the
i18n of product categories.
On Nov 10, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
David,
Forget it, I was thinking that we may not use anymore the category
description field, but I guess it's needed if we want to keep
things fast.
So Si, it seems that if you want to remove the description field
from demo ProductCategory data it's ok, isn'it ?
Jacques
Jacques,
Sorry, you lost me. What is the "DB description" field, and what
refactoring and such would this imply?
-David
On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
David,
OK, and what about the DB description field always needed and some
DB refactoring that this (and more eventually) may imply ?
Jacques
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For "demo" data, the performance doesn't matter as much. Better to
demonstrate and test, at least with one of the fields.
-David
On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I'm not sure because as David already explained there are 2 ways
for this.
Quick one : std description field
Longuer one : std description field overidden by data source
content (this implies a default locale that seems ok now)
And IIRW David seemed to keep std description field because it's
quicker.
Actually, if we do according to your proposition is the DB
description field always needed ?
And if we go in this direction maybe some DB refactoring have
to be
thought about ?
Jacques
From: "Si Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So should we remove the description field from these
ProductCategory
in the demo data? I think so, or how would one be able to see
the
alternate locale description?
Best Regards,
Si
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
