Is this an open talk? If so, I would say a word. Congratulations!
As OFBiz is the top level project of Apache, I don't think there will be any limitation on the area of enterprise systems. You are seeds (my heroes as well) and Apache is the garden. We really hope the new OFBiz project can grow out as many exciting subprojects as possible. Jakarta is an amazing sample. Why not OFBiz? Regards, Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd. 在 2006-11-14二的 20:07 -0700，David E Jones写道： > On Nov 14, 2006, at 7:55 PM, J Aaron Farr wrote: > > > On 11/14/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Nov 14, 2006, at 7:23 PM, J Aaron Farr wrote: > >> > 2. Please review my wording of the scope of OFBiz in the first 3 > >> > paragraphs > >> > >> This looks just fine and is consistent with existing descriptions of > >> OFBiz (de-acronym-ized, of course). It might be nice to add content > >> management as a specifically mentioned area, and perhaps make it > >> clear that the scope is fairly large related to enterprise > >> information by using something like "general" in front of the > >> "enterprise automation". > > > > Can do. The only thing to be careful of is to not make it too > > general. We tend to be cautious about that so that each project has a > > clear purpose and intention. > > The main thing that limits the scope right now in OFBiz is keeping in > "general" or "generic". In other words, it has the data model, > general services, and general user interfaces that can be used to > build up an enterprise system. This means that "users" will generally > either customize it and build something on top of it, or tolerate > that fact that it is frustratingly generic sometimes. > > How to represent this in a brief project description is another > question... Perhaps using the terms general and generic together > would fit the bill? > > -David >
