Nice, I like... Anil Patel wrote: > 2) Screen Widget based HTML return. The Ajax request makes a simple call > which returns a HTML fragment (developed using screen widgets). The > return is then just plugged in by updating the element content (innerHTML). > > I have used this pattern with screen/ftl for generating html on demand. > > Regards > > > On 12/13/06, A. Zeneski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I am curious as to the pattern used to make the async calls, what method >> of return is used here? >> >> I see two possible patterns which would be useful: >> >> 1) JSON compressed objects. This will require more processing on the >> front end to pull the data and format the HTML. I like leaving this in >> the front end code personally. This is currently implemented using the >> JSONServiceEventHandler request handler. >> >> 2) Screen Widget based HTML return. The Ajax request makes a simple call >> which returns a HTML fragment (developed using screen widgets). The >> return is then just plugged in by updating the element content >> (innerHTML). >> >> Either of these patterns is fine by me, and I believe that for most >> applications a combination of the two would be necessary. >> >> I am sure there are many other ways to accomplish the same thing, but >> since there is so much effort about to begin around 'Ajaxing' OFBiz >> making sure things are consistent is #1 priority. >> >> I'm curious as to what other 'patterns' people have come up with (if >> any). >> >> Andrew >> >> >> Tim Ruppert wrote: >> > Just to continue the push towards Dojo, I am about to submit a new >> > Anonymous Checkout process for >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-510 which is based upon >> > Dojo. You guys will like it - 3 steps and working towards my 2 step >> > process goal. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Tim >> > -- >> > Tim Ruppert >> > HotWax Media >> > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> > >> > o:801.649.6594 >> > f:801.649.6594 >> > >> > >> > On Dec 13, 2006, at 4:36 PM, A. Zeneski wrote: >> > >> >> I used prototype for my initial test and found it very easy to work >> >> with. Dojo on the other hand seemed to have a much broader learning >> >> curve. It too me a while to get everything working, but I think it is >> >> due to the ajax part being more verbose. >> >> >> >> The extra features such as DND and other widgets is very nice as well. >> >> >> >> The fact that DOJO is available under the BSD license is a plus as >> well. >> >> I think there should be no license issues with this library. >> >> >> >> Should we just say DOJO is the way to go for future Ajax based >> tools in >> >> OFBiz or do we need a formal vote? >> >> >> >> Andrew >> >> >> >> Alex D. Fleming wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> Ooops Dojo is supported by IBM & AOL ....so I will prefer Dojo. >> >>> >> >>> http://dojotoolkit.org/foundation/ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 12/14/06, A. Zeneski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Si (& all), >> >>>> >> >>>> I am in process of doing a lot of custom AJAX stuff for a new >> client. >> I >> >>>> intended on using prototype.js but based on conversations with other >> >>>> people decided to go with dojo instead. >> >>>> >> >>>> The main part of what I did was a JSON wrapper around the service >> event >> >>>> handler. What this does is allows you to define (controller) >> requests >> >>>> for ajax calls and have the results return in a lightweight (JSON) >> >>>> format. >> >>>> >> >>>> This will work with any front end toolkit (Yahoo, Prototype, Dojo, >> >>>> etc). >> >>>> The main point is to define a standard pattern for AJAX requests in >> >>>> OFBiz. >> >>>> >> >>>> Deciding on a toolkit for the javascript is very important and based >> on >> >>>> what I have researched and discussed with other people, Dojo seems >> >>>> to be >> >>>> the way to go. >> >>>> >> >>>> Of course, I am open for discussion with this, but we really should >> >>>> decide on a standard for contributions back to OFBiz. The last thing >> I >> >>>> want to see is several different ways of communication and different >> >>>> toolkits being used. >> >>>> >> >>>> Prototype.js has been removed from SVN for the time being. As >> soon as >> >>>> there is code which uses one of the toolkits it can be added back >> in. >> >>>> >> >>>> Let's start a community vote for the default AJAX toolkit to use in >> >>>> OFBiz. Based on the work I did, I have already setup the back end >> >>>> pattern, services using JSON for the return. Now let's decide on a >> >>>> front >> >>>> end toolkit. >> >>>> >> >>>> First lets, define the candidates: >> >>>> >> >>>> 1) Dojo >> >>>> 2) Prototype >> >>>> >> >>>> Andy >> >>>> >> > >> > >> >> >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
