I personally don't like it, it make coding harder.
so if it is not a standard, or is not required, I probably won't follow it.
Oleg Kozyrev Jr. sent the following on 7/27/2006 1:23 AM:
I think, both, because this is the only way to do comple conditions.
See for example
applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/chartofaccounts/GlAccountForm.xml
at line 161 and 163. It also uses escape sequences.
================= Your previous mail
it is new.
So I am asking if this is a new standard, or best practice.
Oleg Kozyrev Jr. sent the following on 7/27/2006 1:09 AM:
Well, actually there is:
use-when="(parameters.get("communicationEventTypeId")!=null)&&(parameters.get("communicationEventTypeId").equals("EMAIL_COMMUNICATION"))"
with escade codeings. Actually, I don't understand what is the problem.
When you want to use &, <, >, ", etc. in XML you need to use &, <,
, " or use CDATA area.
Try Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/OFBiz-f2740.html
It is really nice (threads, etc. ) :)
========= Your previous mail:
my apologies
applications/party/webapp/partymgr/communication/CommForms.xml
BTW it is easier if the orginal messge is included. saves me having to
hunt for it.
I am not using snapple so don't have the luxury of seeing the thread.
Oleg Kozyrev Jr. sent the following on 7/27/2006 12:53 AM:
BJ,
Could you please specify the file more exactly? I can find it. Also I
can't
find the line you provided.
But, it seems to me, that to put '&' in XML we have to use '&'
Oleg.
