Jacopo,
> The pc production run should complete correctly without the need to set BOMs;
> this is a financial configuration issue and I can't be of great help now,
> sorry. Maybe Si would help you to spot the problem.
You mean to say that Si Chen had to modify the OFBiz's production run codes so they link to his
financial module?
I'll try OFBiz without OT and see if the problems persist. Will let you know.
Jonathon
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Jonathon,
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Jacopo,
Erm, I just sent you another email. I hacked in and found the problem.
It's got something to do with BOMs. Yes, the code execution path does
run through Si Chen's financial module. But his UtilCOGS.java calls
OFBiz's BOM services (getManufacturingComponents, to be exact).
Si Chen's ProductAverageCost records seems auto-generated at some
point, upon some transaction in OFBiz. However, upon failing to find a
relevant record in ProductAverageCost, Si Chen's codes goes to OFBiz's
getProductCost service. Somehow, that traces back to the BOM services.
Well, we can say that Si Chen could've given us an easier error message.
The pc production run should complete correctly without the need to set
BOMs; this is a financial configuration issue and I can't be of great
help now, sorry. Maybe Si would help you to spot the problem.
Please help? :P No more reverse-engineering for me, please. Not when
there's such an expert community here. I'm trying to defer to the
expert community as much as possible, and not waste God-given time.
Overall, it seems the Job Shop area has quite a few kinks. But I'm
hoping that's because I was using it in very unusual unexpected ways.
Well, let's say that the manufacturing processes will work correctly
only after a complete system setup is done (including routing, boms,
costs), especially if you want to run it with the financial processes:
so if there is a problem somewhere it will appear.
Also, the existing manufacturing framework has been built to be as
general as possible; however not all the manufacturing aspects are
already covered by the existing code (or are managed if you follow
precise workflows and data configuration). This is what our customers
are doing.
I'd suggest to focus on what you are trying to achieve, try to see if
you can find it in OFBiz, and if not, post your question on a precise
issue here: it will be easier for us to help you.
Jacopo
Jonathon
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Jonathon,
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Jacopo,
Sorry, I may have done a myriad of other actions to get the
"required parameter is missing".
The real error (where it all starts) is probably this:
"Service Error [postRawMaterialIssuancesToGl]: Unable to find a
product average cost for product [ETH_BRAND] in organization
[Company]".
Ah yes, this is a configuration issue: using the webtools add a
record in ProductAverageCost for each of the components of your pc
and it should work (it is needed by the Opentap's financial component).
Jacopo
Under Product -> Prices, I've created a new price entry "Average
Cost". Still doesn't work.
Anyway, the reproduce the whole thing, simply order a PC001 from the
storefront, then go to Job Shop to try to complete the automatically
generated production run.
Jonathon
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Jacopo,
See my previous email below for how to reproduce the error. I get
the error right when I'm adding quantity produced for "individual
deliverables (ETH_BRAND, HD2GB_BRAND, RAM256_BRAND)".
The 1st error message I see in console.log is:
ModelService.java:396:ERROR] [ModelService.validate] :
{postInventoryProducedToGl} : (IN) Required test error:
org.ofbiz.service.ServiceValidationException: The following
required parameter is missing:
[postInventoryProducedToGl.inventoryItemIds]
