I don't see any other direction for OFBiz to aspire towards. Always good to have a superset of features, then customize or cut down for specialized needs.

Eg, the Party concept is flexible and great, so I can even make my cat a "person". So is the Product concept, allowing for multi-level BOMs easily.

By the way, I've just completed my testing of the Job Shop problem (the reason I started this thread). Will post my findings in this thread.

Jonathon

Andrew Sykes wrote:
Well, sure, that's why I always need a belt with my trousers ;-)

The generic nature of OfBiz is one of the most irritating things for
everyone and at the same time OfBiz's greatest asset.

What a funny world we live in!

- Andrew

On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 12:53 -0700, David E Jones wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Andrew Sykes wrote:

+1 For leaving the jars in place. It always makes me wince when I have
to trawl the web to look for all the dependencies when installing
something.

Seems funny to be discussing an auto-installer and stripping out all the
jars in the same week!

I guess it just goes to show how different people's perspectives are.
Yes, this is a perfect example of the glory of the open source way... ;) If there is an opinion, it will come out sooner or later, and sometimes some interesting combinations all at once.

It's years of hearing these sorts of perspectives that has lead me to lose my faith (well, not that I ever really had any) in a one size fits all type of solution for just about anything.

-David


Reply via email to