On Sep 19, 2018, at 7:39 PM, Hefty, Sean <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm considering adding an fi_device_limits structure to this in order to > expose hardware specific limitations, with at least the following fields > being defined: > > - ep_cnt, tx_size, tx_cnt, rx_size, rx_cnt, cq_size, cn_cnt, stx_cnt, > srx_cnt, av_size
Seems like a generally good idea. But can we be a little more explicit on the names? E.g.: - I assume "cnt" is "count". Are we allergic to vowels? :-) - Is "cn_cnt" a typo for "cq_count" :-) ? - Is "size" the maximum size of something? - Is "count" the number of items currently used? -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] _______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
