> - I assume "cnt" is "count". Are we allergic to vowels? :-)
Why yes I am. Thank you for your concern. I was matching the existing naming convention, which uses 'cnt'. Other names similarly reference some existing fields. But we can work on the names. > - Is "cn_cnt" a typo for "cq_count" :-) ? Yes > - Is "size" the maximum size of something? Yes > - Is "count" the number of items currently used? No - maximum number of items available (likely statically defined). These would all be part of a struct fi_device_limits, which I'm hoping is clear enough that these are maximum hardware limits. There would be a correlation with existing fields where possible. E.g. (based on my sample names) These are optimal values -> This are maximum limitations ------------------------ ---------------------------- fi_tx_attr::size -> fi_device_limits::tx_size fi_rx_attr::size -> fi_device_limits::rx_size fi_cq_attr::size -> fi_device_limits::cq_size fi_av_attr::count -> fi_device_limits::av_size (messed this one up) fi_domain_attr::cq_cnt -> fi_device_limits::cq_cnt fi_domain_attr::tx_ctx_cnt -> fi_device_limits::tx_cnt (change to tx_ctx_cnt) fi_domain_attr::rx_ctx_cnt -> fi_device_limits::rx_cnt (change to rx_ctx_cnt) fi_domain_attr::ep_cnt -> fi_device_limits::ep_cnt new -> fi_device_limits::stx_cnt (change to stx_ctx_cnt) new -> fi_device_limits::srx_cnt (change to srx_ctx_cnt) new -> fi_device_limits::av_cnt - Sean _______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
