Hi Denis,
>-----Original Message----- >From: Denis Kenzior [mailto:denk...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 8:49 AM >To: ofono@ofono.org >Cc: Gu, Yang >Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] stk: Support send ss response > >Hi Yang, > >On 09/21/2010 05:21 AM, Yang Gu wrote: >> --- >> src/stkutil.c | 2 ++ >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/stkutil.c b/src/stkutil.c >> index cdd6b4e..d35094b 100644 >> --- a/src/stkutil.c >> +++ b/src/stkutil.c >> @@ -5449,6 +5449,8 @@ const unsigned char *stk_pdu_from_response(const >struct stk_response *response, >> &response->select_item.item_id, >> NULL); >> break; >> + case STK_COMMAND_TYPE_SEND_SS: >> + break; > >This seems wrong, isn't the additional information field mandatory? I couldn't understand this comment well. Additional information is a part of result dataobj, so it's already included. Is there something I should handle further? Regards, -Yang _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
