Hi Denis, On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Denis Kenzior <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Tonny, > > > In your proposed patch, it bypass the unsolicited response only if the > > 2nd number after +CGREG: is not single digit, however if the lac is > > single digit, we will still get the wrong state number. > > The lac is given as a 2 byte number and should always be printed as four > hexadecimal letters. If this is not the case, then you should have a > serious talk with your vendor. > Well, if this (i.e. lac are 4 hex-digits) is the case, then I totally agree with you that it could ignore unsolicited response properly in at_util_parse_reg() for my case. Thank you so much for the coach :) Best Regards, Tonny
_______________________________________________ ofono mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
