Hi Giacinto, Thanks for looking at this so quickly!
On 04/01/2019, Giacinto Cifelli <[email protected]> wrote: >> The comments for a88662d23c45f49d9af5a508d4d0a778950b2420 made me >> suspect it is this part of the patch that broke it: >> >> diff --git a/gatchat/ppp_lcp.c b/gatchat/ppp_lcp.c >> index df9cd0ef..3fe38217 100644 >> --- a/gatchat/ppp_lcp.c >> +++ b/gatchat/ppp_lcp.c >> @@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ static enum rcr_result lcp_rcr(struct pppcp_data >> *pppcp, >> *new_len = 4; >> >> return RCR_NAK; >> + >> + case G_AT_PPP_AUTH_METHOD_NONE: >> + return RCR_REJECT; > > I remember this, I added it because of a suggestion that couldn't just > ignore it. > Is your PDP context configured for AUTH_NONE, PAP or CHAP? AUTH_NONE. > And what happens if you change it? It took me a while to understand this was the issue as I had another sim who would request CHAP and that one worked (even if it was empty username and pass, operators are weird..) So from what I have seen I would say the issue is only with AUTH_NONE. Most likely RCR_REJECT is the wrong thing to send, but my knowledge of PPP is basically whatever I read today and a quick look at the RFC so I am not in a position to comment in more detail on that. What I do know is that removing that bit made it work for me. Cheers, Philippe _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono
