Hi Denis, Den mån 12 aug. 2019 kl 21:57 skrev Denis Kenzior <denk...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Richard, > > > So I don't get this. We have CREG telling us: "we're on LTE" and > CGREG > > telling us "Oh we don't know what our status is". Why do you trust > one > > and not the other? Are you sure this doesn't belong in a driver > quirk > > somewhere? > > > > > > When CREG tells us we are on LTE, we will probably not even try attach > > to gprs (CGATT), > > refer to gprs_netreg_update. > > In my understanding that means that its natural that CGREG reports > > unknown or similar. > > CEREG would be the interesting one... but since the code is built around > > using activated context as condition when running on LTE I think we > should > > use the same condition here. > > Ah, so you're on one of those modems that started using CEREG instead of > CGREG for reporting LTE. So in that case I'm fine with this (maybe add > a more clarifying comment). But I suspect that we also need to consider > adding ofono_gprs_lte_status as well and taking both into account. > I will refine the comment, and yes I think we need lte_status at some point. There might be a chance we can do it without, but only when LTE is the "other case", when more techologies are introduced we definitely need a status per tech. I have more in the pipeline regarding this, I'm kind of working step by step to get LTE to work properly and with hand over to come. --Richard
_______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono
