Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Hefty, Sean <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>> cl_memclr --> NdisZeroMemory
>>> cl_memcpy --> NdisMoveMemory
>>> cl_memcmp --> memcmp
>>> cl_memset --> memset
>>
>> The latter should be RtlCompareMemory and RtlFillMemory.  All of the
>> complib abstractions should eventually be replaced with the native
>> calls.
>
> Is this conversion from complib cl_xxx routines to native ones also
> intended for OpenSM and friends (in Windows) ?
>
> -- Hal

No such intention. Compatibility ranks higher in the OpenSM world; IPoIB is 
another story.
_______________________________________________
ofw mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw

Reply via email to