Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote: >> As facilitators; the role as currently used is a communication conduit, >> adding grant editing would be an extension that may or may not be >> a good thing. > > I am concerned about this as well. This seems like a pretty big change > to the facilitation role, and removes oversite from the OGB. I don't think > we (the OGB) want that, do we? Have facilitators asked for this? Would > they all fully understand the repercussions for their actions? There > would be no oversite like there is now. It would require action on > the OGB after the fact to review (which is easy to put off, and then > never actually do...)
There would be oversight because the grants would be visible. Is there any evidence to suggest that the Facilitators wouldn't carry out their duties in a diligent fashion? -- Alan Burlison --
