On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Jim Grisanzio <Jim.Grisanzio at sun.com> wrote:
> So, if Facilitators are not allowed to do the simple clerical task
Whoa! I don't believe there is any disagreement with the delegation
of effort to facilitators.
The hiccup is simply that the workflow that has been suggested is incomplete.
That workflow has been described as:
1) A new contributor is identified in a collective.
2) The facilitator in that collective [does some web stuff]
and a new contributor is born.
3) Somehow/sometime a report is generated saying
"here are the new contributors".
The missing link is that no process has been suggested for how the OGB
Secretary's constitutional role interacts with the above or how any
mixups can be addressed.
If, instead, the workflow was extended to
1) A new contributor is identified in a collective.
2A) The facilitator in that collective [does some web stuff]
and a new contributor REQUEST IS ADDED TO THE
OGB SECRETARY'S WORK QUEUE
2b) THE OGB SECRETARY [does some web stuff]
and new contributors are born or remanded back
to facilitators so mixups can be addressed.
3) Somehow/sometime a report is generated saying
"here are the new contributors".
I think everyone would be happy.
-John
