On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Cyril Plisko <cyril.plisko at mountall.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Simon Phipps <Simon.Phipps at sun.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 28, 2008, at 10:14, John Plocher wrote: > > > OGB elect, > > > > > > > > Nice work, John. I'd also like us to set up a ticket system somehow > > for items "in the queue" for discussion, since editing a wiki page > > like this is a poor tool for the job. I know people think it's crazy > > to use the OpenSolaris Bugzilla for this, but it has some clear > > benefits: > > * It is actually designed as a ticket system! > > * It allows per-issue discussion that is easily tracked > > * It's easy to see which issues are still live > > > > We already have an "OGB" product category there. I'd like to have a > > "business" component added against which OGB business could be logged > > by any Contributor until it is added to the agenda and discussed. That > > way we'll not see random changes made to the agenda without discussion > > (like I was about to do). I'd suggest the agenda only be edited by the > > Secretary once this ticket system is in place. > > Simon, > > may I suggest looking into Trac [1] - it has wiki, ticketing system, > milestones/events, roadmap, and even SCM ! Everything nicely > integrated together. Worth checking, IMHO. > > > [1] http://trac.edgewall.org/
Not to be a wet blanket, but didn't our tools community select BugZilla for good reasons? Do we really want yet another tracking system? I know that technically BugZilla was selected for software defect tracking, but since Trac overlaps completely in functionality (and provides a lot more), I'm a little surprised by this suggestion. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben
