On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Jim Grisanzio <Jim.Grisanzio at sun.com> wrote: > <snip> > > I updated this again to reflect the removal of the Facilitator role, and I'm > also recommending the removal of the Emeritus role.
I actually think we may need both. Every part of the organization needs a point of contact, which is what the facilitator role really is. In many cases, the leader of a collective may be the right person, but it isn't obvious that the leader is alwyays going to be both managerial and secretarial - in which case a separate facilitator on file may be useful. And in my view of the electorate, voting rights don't expire, but you can become inactive. Perhaps Emeritus would be a nicer term than Inactive? -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
