John Plocher wrote: > In addition to the other reasons bandied around, this seems to argue > pretty strongly for keeping the collectives called "Participant" > and "Contributer" distinct. > > Does the following user model work for you, Alan? Glynn? > > When their peers feel so motivated, a Participant can be > elevated to Contributer status on a per-project/user-group/ > community basis.
Yes, works for me. -- Alan Burlison --
