I didn't define it (because it is defined in section 7.5 of the Constitution);
they show up here in 2.2:
The Facilitators of the Community Groups wishing to initiate the
Project shall, as a joint action, send ...
The current wording says that the CGs themselves should send something,
clearly a semantic impossibility. Since the constitution requires the
Facilitator to "communicat[e] the Community Group's status to the OGB",
this naturally seems their job.
-John
Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey,
>
> John Plocher wrote:
>> Consider it sent :-)
>>
>> I promised to write up the language of the changes and send it to
>> Glynn - here it is.
>
> Thanks John, appreciate it.
>
>> We didn't talk about it on the call, but it strikes me that we could also
>> clarify the role of CG Facilitator as well. I've added that clarification
>> to the following as well.
>
> You don't specifically call out the CG Facilitator - did you meant to include
> it? Given that we don't seem to have a set of defined Facilitators (arguably a
> bug) for each CG, I'd be hesitant including it based on what we have
> currently.
>
>
> Glynn
