Glynn Foster wrote:
> [resending, got the address wrong the first time]
>
> John Plocher wrote:
>> I didn't define it (because it is defined in section 7.5 of the
>> Constitution);
>> they show up here in 2.2:
>
> Duh, completely missed that - though I wonder what proportion of either the
> Facilitator or the project proposer mail the Project Herald in reality? To
> some
> extents (given the information that the Project Herald typically needs), it
> makes a lot more sense for it to be the latter.
Could be, but coming from the facilitator makes it a bit more official.
I don't care one way or the other (or both) - anything is better than
the current wording :-)
-John
