On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:16 PM, John Sonnenschein <johnsonnenschein at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Alan Coopersmith > <Alan.Coopersmith at sun.com> wrote: > > > > Simon Phipps wrote: > > > On Feb 21, 2008, at 21:38, John Sonnenschein wrote: > > > > > >> I would still like this item to be placed on the ballot to lay the > > >> item to rest so that we can all move on without feeling slighted. > > > > > > > > > I don't believe the Constitution has any concept of "measures on the > > > ballot" like this - the OGB makes these sorts of decisions. You may > > > wish to propose a constitutional amendment to make it possible. > > > > I think the OGB could put this on the ballot in the same capacity as > > the "priority opinion poll" from last year - a way to gauge the opinion > > of the community without having a binding issue. > > > > Given that we have over 360 registered voters, but maybe 10% of that > > taking part in these discussions, it's hard to say what the community > > as a whole believes should be done. > > > > +1 > > this is precisely what I envision. >
sorry for the immediate follow up, but I'd just like to add that binding or not, I do promise to back off the issue entirely and welcome Indiana as the new OpenSolaris distribution if it passes. -- PGP Public Key 0x437AF1A1 Available on hkp://pgp.mit.edu
