On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Glynn Foster wrote: > 2) New Project Proposals > > ... > Wasn't clear that project proposals needed an OGB response. >
AFAIC, they don't, but it is good to have ogb-discuss (a single, central list) be the place where all project proposals are required to be recorded by their sponsoring CG. > In practice > for all projects, it makes more sense for the project leader to send > that announcement rather than the OGB. The OGB don't need to approve > project proposals - Eric and Jim weren't sure whether it required a > response from the OGB. Rich commented that OGB shouldn't need to be > involved. Need to clarify this situation. As proposals come to ogb-discuss, > they can get picked up by Eric and created. Cool. That's what I've been doing (however I owe project-announce a post announcing the instantiation of the Bhimavaram User Group) Eric
