On 04/04/07, Ben Rockwood <benr at cuddletech.com> wrote: > OGB Meetings should be open, but in any meeting its irregular for > observers to be involved. By that rationale I would suggest that so > long as actual dialog of the meeting, unedited, is available for public > review it fits the criteria for "open meeting". Making an audio > recording of the meeting available following each would be something I'd > appreciate.
I heartily agree with this view. Not only do meetings where it is always a "free-for-all" tend to lose productivity, but it tends to encourage a lot of "me toos" (oh the irony...). I think Ben's view of things is spot on in this regard. -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst binarycrusader at gmail.com - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
