Peter Tribble wrote: > My request at this point is sort of the opposite of the above: I think the > electorate assignments I've checked are correct. However, for the following > communities: > > hpcdev > ldoms > observability > printing > > the correction process has left the community leaderless. I suggest that > making all CCs leaders in those cases would allow those communities to > actually manage themselves. (And if they want to change the list of leaders > they can do so - at the moment they're stuck. And adding all the CCs as > leaders and then handing over control is probably easier than trying to > work out the leader list.)
Thanks for checking and your suggestion seems completely sensible to me... > I think the same is true for the distribution community as well, although > John Plocher may wish to advise on that one. Sure, again that makes sense. > Does this message serve as an adequate request, or do you want me > to log a bug? (Although I couldn't spot an obvious category to file it > under.) I'd just log it under the 'grants' category, it's close enough and will make it easier to find in the future. Perhaps we need a 'community setup' category in bugzilla as well? I can add one if required. -- Alan Burlison --
