On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:33 PM, John Plocher <john.plocher at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Bonnie> Since people have multiple reasons for needing to reactivate >> accounts >> Bonnie> (like doing putbacks to ON), we can not refuse to reactivate >> accounts. > > Nobody was suggesting that you do that - just that the poll app needed to > know the date of record and act appropriately... > >> >> Valerie> I believe we'll have to go with the higher count, as those people >> Valerie> have the potential to vote. >> > > Don't raise quorum.? We supposedly set it as the number of valid, auth'd CC > grants on the date of record specifically to avoid this type of dribbling > change and confusion.? While I'd also like to not raise the auth'd list, > given the technical limits of the website and the connection between auth > and putback and poll, I can live with letting late-auth's people also vote.
I'm with Plocher; the whole point of the date of record is that you set the numbers and eligibility at a fixed point in time. Once you've done that you generate the fixed list. So we go with the lower quorum. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
