On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Bonnie Corwin wrote: > Since there wasn't 24-hour notification, I assume there's no meeting > today. Is that correct?
As usual, our preference for expedience over strict adherence to the rules has left us in an ambiguous situation. Is the weekly meeting a "regular meeting" per 6.8, for which no notice is required, or does the cancelled-unless-notice-given aspect mean that the regular meeting was cancelled and Mr. Rockwood is now asking that another board member join him in requesting a "special meeting", for which 7 days' notice or waiver is required? Personally I'm willing to grant waiver of notice and meet, and even join Mr. Rockwood in requesting the meeting (for his sake only; I have no agenda items). But Mr. Dik's inability to attend may be related to the timing of notice, and I would think it entirely reasonable to justify cancellation on that basis. In any case, every board member would have to waive notice. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!"
