Simon Phipps wrote: > http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/OGB_2008/007 > While (I hope) preserving the intent of Plocher's original I have > extensively massaged the resolution to get it ready for voting. Please > take a look and improve it further. > > In particular, in the pursuit of general transparency, I have extended > its scope to become a "Policy on private OGB discussions". > > S. > > > > _______________________________________________ > ogb-discuss mailing list > ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss > Hi Simon, Looks great. My only issue is with point 4.2. While I enthusiastically support a "deadline" for private conversations to be made public, I worry that deadlining it in only 2 meetings after the *start* of the discussion is too soon. Does that provide enough time for reasonable conversation between the OGB, and any other third party we would be discussing with? If it's a legal case, it may involve lawyers, etc. and we've seen from the branding/trademark discussion of the previous OGB (which, granted probably did draw on unnecessarily long) that some discussions will be more than 2 meetings long.
cheers, steve -- stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
