Keith, As we've been discussing, the current project guidelines specify in section 2.2 that the OGB should be notified. Yet the OGB has essentially been telling people to stop notifying the OBG, and to notify a new alias (project-setup I believe). If that's the official policy that you want followed, the guidelines need to be updated.
Thanks, Nick Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:29:58PM -0700, Nicholas Solter wrote: > >> This looks great. Just to be clear, the lack of OGB involvement is a >> change from the current policy, outlined in section 2.2 of the current >> project guidelines. Is this an official change of policy on which the >> OGB voted, or do these guidelines not represent policy that requires a >> vote? Is the change of policy already in effect? If so, when did it take >> effect? > > When a change in policy occurs, it will be reflected in the OGB > meeting minutes and the contents of the policies page will be updated. > Until then, there has been no change. This is why the minutes and > policies pages exist. > > Also, the OGB's involvement has always been limited to notification; > the current policy has never required OGB approval of any project. > -- Nicholas Solter, Solaris Cluster Development http://blogs.sun.com/nsolter
