Hey, Nicholas Solter wrote: > Hi Glynn, > > Thanks for working on this much-needed document. I sent you a few > comments a while back that I'm not sure I see reflected here. See > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-July/002108.html > > My general point is that the constitution seems to require consensus > voting for project instantiation and core contributor grants, while your > wording implies that community groups have more leeway in that area. For > example, you refer to "suggested" voting procedures, while my reading of > the constitution is that they are required.
Having read through the constitution, looks like you are right. I'll try and rewrite the effected sections (though I think this somewhat contrary to the spirit of wanting the community groups to govern themselves). "Actions requiring a vote shall have a voting period of no less than seventy-two (72) hours." - Hooray for stop energy! ;) Glynn
