Rich Teer wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Is it too late to petition for a slight change in nomenclature?
> I'd rather see the ISO 8601 compatible "2008-11" being used
> rather than "2008.11", and I know I'm not alone.

Sounds like a matter for the Indiana project, not the OGB.

(Personally, I prefer 2008.11 since it can be used in places that
 expect period-separated version numbers, but I suppose that
 annoys people in locales that use commas for decimals.)

-- 
        -Alan Coopersmith-           alan.coopersmith at sun.com
         Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering


Reply via email to