Rich Teer wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it too late to petition for a slight change in nomenclature? > I'd rather see the ISO 8601 compatible "2008-11" being used > rather than "2008.11", and I know I'm not alone.
Sounds like a matter for the Indiana project, not the OGB. (Personally, I prefer 2008.11 since it can be used in places that expect period-separated version numbers, but I suppose that annoys people in locales that use commas for decimals.) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering