James Carlson wrote: > Liane Praza writes: >> James Carlson writes: >>> It works. The community leaders don't seem to be reading the >>> documentation for how the process is supposed to work, and the OGB >>> hasn't been on much of a campaign to push their noses in it, so that's >>> how it is. >> I'm not entirely certain, but I think this means: "A community is >> supposed nominate *a single person* as facilitator to the OGB. >> If a community continues operating under the current default >> that all core contributors can act as the facilitator, the core >> contributors either didn't read the documentation for how the process >> is supposed to work or simply aren't bothering to properly participate >> in governance."
That's my reading of it, too. Although I'm certainly fine with core contributors being able to act as facilitators, it's probably easier if it's one person per CG. Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
