On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:46:49PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 03:44:28PM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: > > Nicolas Williams wrote: > > >Disaster scenario: > > > > > > I could imagine a case that integrates into Solaris (with internal, > > > closed ARC review), then tries to integrate into OpenSolaris, is told > > > "not without open review" then the open review requires changes that > > > would be incompatible with what was shipped in Solaris, or the team > > > refuses to undergo open review, at which point: impasse. > > > > That is one of the reasons closed review is not a good thing for anyone, > > yes. However, I can't imagine many situations where the delay between the > > two events would span a Solaris release. > > Really? Nothing ever comes to the ARC and integrates just before a > release (for some value of "before" like "last build that accepts > features" or even "last build that accepts bug fixes -- hey we have to > get in!")?
Sorry -- you're outside Sun. My point is stuff has come to the ARC and integrated into Solaris close enough to a _minor_ release that my disaster scenario is not impossible.
