Shawn Walker wrote: > On Dec 5, 2007 10:32 PM, Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote: >> * Is there any constitutional requirement that all content on >> opensolaris.org be controlled via an OGB-approved entity? (such as a >> Community Group, Project, Board, or Committee) > > I assume then that either no-one knows or that no such constitutional > requirement exists?
You can read the Constitution as well as we can, but since you asked, the closest I can see is: The OpenSolaris Community has the authority and responsibility for all decisions pertaining to the OpenSolaris software and collaborative infrastructure within the scope defined by the OpenSolaris Charter. So if you define opensolaris.org as "collaborative infrastructure", we have the authority to make all decisions concerning it, including the authority to delegate control of portions of it to others. > Example pages might include the trademark usage guidelines page that > Sun provides here: > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/trademark_faq/ Frankly, I think if we were to decide the community got to change the pages regarding Sun's trademarks on opensolaris.org, they'd just be moved to sun.com, and perhaps that isn't a bad thing anyway. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
