Glynn Foster wrote: > Sorry, I didn't end up getting the minutes typed up this evening like I > planned > to. The mp3 is here if you want to hear what was discussed - > > http://dlc.sun.com/osol/ogb/audio-recordings/ogb-meeting-12-12-2007.mp3 > > In summary, the proposal was passed, but had significant changes from the one > you originally posted - the most notable being the removal of the content > section of the proposal which was to replace the website editorial committee > proposal that was passed a few weeks ago.
I'm sorry, but it is unacceptable that the proposal has been changed without consulting the group/person who drafted it, and then approved by the OGB. If the OGB wants changes, it needs to reject the proposal, providing the reasoning for doing so, and a list of proposed amendments. Otherwise it is effectively imposing terms on the proposed CG that the CG has had no opportunity to discuss. -- Alan Burlison --
