Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Alan Burlison wrote: > >> Could I have an official OGB response please? I can't respond to the >> issues the OGB obviously had with my proposal until the OGB makes some >> sort of formal reply. >> > > Hopefully Glynn will have formal minutes up soon. The changes the OGB > voted on (some unanimously, others on a mixed vote) were (from memory): > > 1) Minor wording changes to use the language of the Constitution instead > of the language of the website: > s/Community/Community Group/g > s/Community leaders/Core Contributors/g > Unanimous. > 2) Replace "Promote the Website Project to be a Community" with something > more like "Create a Website Community to replace the Website Project", > since it's not a promotion, but a replacement with a different type of > thing. > Unanimous. > 3) Drop #2 about the OpenGrok Project, since the OGB was undecided on > whether moving to a new community or having both communities endorse > it was the better plan, given that we still need to come to a decision > on the question of multiple community ownership/endorsement of projects. > Unanimous. > 4) Drop the Content Project replacing the Website Editorial Committee, and > drop the portion of section 5 of your proposal referring to website-content > mailing list. > 4 in favour. (Rich, Keith, Alan, Jim) 2 against. (Glynn, Steve)
And the final vote on the amended proposal was also 4 in favour (Rich, Keith, Alan, Jim), and 2 against (Glynn & Steve) cheers, steve -- stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
