Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I'm not sure if this is expected or not... as I'm not a member of the > Advocacy group. But the number of Core Contributors in that group is > double that of its nearest competitor (ON, 48 CCs) and *quadruple* that > of its next nearest (Tools, 22 CCs.)
In the last election, it was the User Groups community that was huge - that merged with Marketing to form Advocacy, and inherited the huge number of contributors. > The other wrinkle in all this is that some communities have considerable > overlap in their CC membership. E.g. many of the ON CC's are probably > also CC's in other groups. It would be an interesting data point to > measure "voting loyalty" for each CG, where each CC gets one vote, which > is divided equally amongst all the CGs in which they participate. CCs > that belong only to one CG contribute 1 to that CG. CCs that belong to > two contribute 0.5 to each of those two CGs, and so forth. > > The resulting graph may yield some surprising data about how fairly (or > otherwise) weighted the election is likely to be. If you'd like to make charts or different stats, the raw data I used was from http://poll.opensolaris.org/grants.csv - note that there's a small bug in that file, in that the entry for user "roamer" has a comma in the real name field, so doesn't parse correctly when you're counting commas. After fixing that with a quick vi, my method of counting core contributors per community was simply: awk -F, '$3 == 30 {print $4}' grants.csv | sort | uniq -c The fields in that file are: username, name, rank, community, expiration Where the ranks are: 30: Core Contributor 20: Contributor 10: Contributor Emeritus (I cheated and got this all by viewing the JavaScript sources on poll.opensolaris.org.) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
