On Mar 13, 2010, at 18:53, John Plocher wrote: > [from core-contrib-discuss...] > >> and so far not enough people have voted even to pass quorum for the >> Constitution vote. > > Technically, we *have* quorum (143 voters/IRC attendees); what we > don't have is enough votes to have a majority (215). Constitutional > changes require both a quorum (to make a legal election) and a > majority (for it to pass). > > Right now, with 212 votes, we have a legal election and a failed > constitutional update, independent of how people voted on the > constitution. > > We can't assume that all the votes so far have been Aye, so I'd be > much happier with a hundred more votes in the ballot box!
FWIW no-one has called yet. S.
