Actually, Clark. Read Spencer's (the sigil) original posting: "there existed no practical barriers to such a thing (assume the database is "omniscient" and can give you the reference to any piece of OGC - not necessarily the OGC itself, but perhaps it could work kind of like google - when you enter a search string that is allegedly OGC, it returns the name and page number of the source without returning the OGC itself), " Are you saying that a database of references to your products is not a boon to your business. If I understand what he is proposing correctly, you would type in a search:
Search Terms: ___ becomes shaken _____
The browser would return:
(96%) Shaken, Condition Summary, SRD, [link-direct link]View this[/link]
(93%) Shaken, Spell, [link=rpgnow./thisbook]Joe's Book of Enchantment[/link], [link=throwingdice.com/homepage]Throwing Dice Games[/link]
(89%) Staff of Fear, Magic Item, [link=product page]Name of source book[/link], [link=producers homepage]Producer[/link], [link]view this[/link]
etc.


In this case, the producer of the staff of fear allowed this item to be displayed. But I did not allow the spell to be displayed. This would be a boon for writers, especially if it was opt in only. And I can see where this could be considered advertising.

Joe

At 06:58 PM 6/6/2003 -0700, Clark Peterson wrote:
Doug-

Here is the real issue: give the publishers a business
reason to do it. Right now there isnt a good one.

Clark


_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to