> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Press Releases and indicating compatibility
> 
> 
> 
> This is true.  However, people were talking about "d20" by 
> itself, which is why I didn't include those, as they were 
> "d20" plus other words.  The one I cited was a stand-alone "d20".

A point to remember about trademarks. If a trademark dispute ever gets to
court (and let's hope it doesn't), one of the main factors considered is
likelihood of confusion on the part of the consumer.

Now at this point, under current Wizards and Hasbro management, my personal
opinion is that they won't go ballistic legally. I have no proof of this,
just an impression: they seem to be trying to be as reasonable as possible
while protecting their IP.

But it's possible that my impression is wrong, and they're litigious creeps.
And it's certainly possible that future management will be litigious creeps.

So here's some advice to anyone who wants to use "d20" in promoting or
labeling a product WITHOUT complying with the d20 license: don't just worry
about whether you're legit (a good concern), but whether some litigious
creep might disagree that you're legit; and if they might, worry about
whether your use of "d20" might be done in such a way that they could claim
consumer confusion. I'm not saying they would be right to do so, but rather
that you could lose your shirt trying to prove them wrong. I'm also not
saying you can't use "d20" in such a way as to avoid both the d20 STL AND
consumer confusion (though I don't know what that might be). But I suspect
that public proclamations that "I want to indicate my product is d20
compatible without complying with the d20 STL" will make your defense more
complicated if the litigious creeps take over.

I like the d20 STL. It makes it hard for Wizards to sue. Of course, it also
makes it hard to do certain kinds of products. But if I were making such a
product, I would trust market awareness to make the association between my
product and d20. I'd avoid giving ammo to the litigious creeps. 

Martin L. Shoemaker

Martin L. Shoemaker Consulting, Software Design and UML Training
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.MartinLShoemaker.com
http://www.UMLBootCamp.com

http://www.TabletUML.com -- The UML tool you don't have to learn!

_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to